United States v. Montealegrecharro II

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedMay 23, 2022
Docket201900303
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Montealegrecharro II (United States v. Montealegrecharro II) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Montealegrecharro II, (N.M. 2022).

Opinion

This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON, BAKER, and HOUTZ Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES Appellee

v.

Victor MONTEALEGRECHARRO Aviation Boatswain’s Mate Aircraft Handler Airman (E-3) U.S. Navy Appellant

No. 201900303

Decided: 23 May 2022

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judges: Ann K. Minami (arraignment) Kimberly J. Kelly (trial)

Sentence adjudged 8 August 2019 by a special court-martial convened at Naval Base Kitsap, Bremerton, Washington, consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to E-1 and confinement for ten months. 1

For Appellant: Major Mary Claire Finnen, USMC

1 The convening authority suspended confinement in excess of eight months pur- suant to a pretrial agreement. United States v. Montealegrecharro, NMCCA No. 201900303 Opinion of the Court

For Appellee: Lieutenant Catherine M. Crochetiere, JAGC, USN

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

PER CURIAM: This case is before us for review a second time. During our initial review, we set aside the Convening Authority Action [CA Action] and Entry of Judg- ment [EOJ] and remanded for new post-trial processing. 2 Following completion of the new CA Action and EOJ, the case has returned to the Court for comple- tion of appellate review. After careful consideration of the record, submitted without further assign- ment of error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substan- tial rights occurred. 3 The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

2 United States v. Montealegrecharro, No. 201900303, 2021 CCA LEXIS 421 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. Aug. 20, 2021) (unpublished). 3 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Montealegrecharro II, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-montealegrecharro-ii-nmcca-2022.