United States v. Monroe

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Monroe. Read the opinion of the Court — 396 F. App'x 33
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2007·No. 07-1427·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-1427

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

EARLY D. MONROE, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-00691-WMN)

Submitted: October 18, 2007 Decided: October 22, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Early D. Monroe, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kathleen E. Lyon, Kenneth L. Greene, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Early D. Monroe, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the United States on its action

seeking to reduce to judgment an outstanding tax assessment. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Monroe, No. 1:06-cv-00691-WMN (D. Md.

Mar. 14, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Monroe, (4th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Monroe (United States v. Monroe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.