United States v. Monquay Williams

610 F. App'x 277
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2015·No. 15-6711·Unpublished

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Monquay Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion to reduce his sentence. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a) (2012), we “lack jurisdiction to review the extent of the district court’s downward departure.” United States v. Hill, 70 F.3d 321, 324 (4th Cir.1995); see United States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 193-94 (4th Cir.2012) (explaining that, although the court may entertain “challenges to the lawfulness of the method used by the district court in making its sentencing decision,” this court lacks “jurisdiction to review any part of a discretionary sentencing decision”). Because the sole issue raised on appeal attacks the extent of the reduction awarded by the district court, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Monquay Williams, 610 F. App'x 277 (4th Cir. 2015).

610 F. App'x 277 (United States v. Monquay Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Stephan Gary Hill
70 F.3d 321 (Fourth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Davis
679 F.3d 190 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)