United States v. Mompaz

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2001·No. 00-21132·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-21132 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSÉ BENITO MOMPAZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-424-1 -------------------- August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent José

Benito Mompaz has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Mompaz has responded to the motion. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Mompaz’s argument that counsel was ineffective will not be

reviewed in this direct appeal. See United States v. Gibson, 55

F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995). Counsel’s motion for leave to

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-21132 -2-

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mompaz, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Mompaz (United States v. Mompaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Gibson
55 F.3d 173 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)