United States v. Mominee

6 C.M.A. 179, 6 USCMA 179, 19 C.M.R. 305, 1955 CMA LEXIS 323, 1955 WL 3442
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedJuly 22, 1955
DocketNo. 6521
StatusPublished

This text of 6 C.M.A. 179 (United States v. Mominee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mominee, 6 C.M.A. 179, 6 USCMA 179, 19 C.M.R. 305, 1955 CMA LEXIS 323, 1955 WL 3442 (cma 1955).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam:

A general court-martial sitting at Camp Stewart, Georgia, found the accused, Mominee, guilty of desertion [180]*180terminated by apprehension, in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 85, 50 USC § 679. We granted review to determine whether the finding of apprehension was supported by sufficient evidence.

Since the proof here was even stronger than that relied on by the Government in United States v. Simone, 6 USCMA 146, 19 CMR 272, and United States v. Lugo, 6 USCMA 151, 19 CMR 277 — and was wholly uncontroverted by the defense — we must hold, in accordance with our decisions in those cases, that the prosecution safely met its burden of proof.

Therefore, the findings and sentence, as approved by intermediate appellate authorities, must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Simone
6 C.M.A. 146 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 C.M.A. 179, 6 USCMA 179, 19 C.M.R. 305, 1955 CMA LEXIS 323, 1955 WL 3442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mominee-cma-1955.