United States v. Molina-Vasquez
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT October 25, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20732 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSE MOLINA-VASQUEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:05-CR-161-1 --------------------
Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Jose Molina-Vasquez has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molina-Vasquez has
not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and
counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.
Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Molina-Vasquez (United States v. Molina-Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.