United States v. Molina-Montoya
This text of 22 F. App'x 873 (United States v. Molina-Montoya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[874]*874MEMORANDUM
Oscar Ruiz de Chavez and Sergio Molina-Montoya appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress the testimony of two cooperating defendants as “fruit of the poisonous tree.”
The testimony of the cooperating defendants was sufficiently attenuated from the unlawful search to remove any taint. United States v. Ceccolini, 435 U.S. 268, 279-80, 98 S.Ct. 1054, 55 L.Ed.2d 268 (1978). The district court properly denied the motions to suppress.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 F. App'x 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-molina-montoya-ca9-2001.