United States v. Molina-Mendoza

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 2023
Docket22-40732
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Molina-Mendoza (United States v. Molina-Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Molina-Mendoza, (5th Cir. 2023).

Opinion

Case: 22-40732 Document: 00516781850 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/09/2023

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 22-40732 June 9, 2023 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Walter Yovany Molina-Mendoza,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:22-CR-756-1 ______________________________

Before King, Higginson, and Willett, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Walter Yovany Molina-Mendoza has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Molina-Mendoza has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-40732 Document: 00516781850 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/09/2023

No. 22-40732

record reflected therein. Because the issue of whether the district court plainly erred in awarding Molina-Mendoza three criminal history points for his deadly weapon conviction is nonfrivolous, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is DENIED and counsel is directed to file a brief on the merits addressing this issue and any other nonfrivolous issues that counsel deems appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Molina-Mendoza, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-molina-mendoza-ca5-2023.