United States v. Molina

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Molina. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 F. App'x 977
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 15, 2000·No. 00-40638·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40638 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROY MOLINA, also known as José Roel Molina,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-96-CR-46-2 -------------------- December 14, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel for Roy Molina, the Federal Public Defender, has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Molina has filed a

response. Our independent review of the brief, the response, and

the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. See id.

Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Molina, (5th Cir. 2000).

United States v. Molina (United States v. Molina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)