United States v. Mojica-Segura
This text of 166 F. App'x 948 (United States v. Mojica-Segura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Jesus Mojica-Segura appeals his 46-month sentence imposed after his guilty-plea conviction on one count of being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
[949]*949Mojica-Segura preserved his claim in the district court that his sentence violated United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), when he challenged the constitutionality of the Sentencing Guidelines in his sentencing memorandum. See United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1078 n. 1 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Accordingly, we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with Booker. United States v. Kortgaard, 425 F.3d 602, 610-11 (9th Cir. 2005).1
SENTENCE VACATED and REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 F. App'x 948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mojica-segura-ca9-2006.