United States v. Mohammed Kwaning

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 28, 2021
Docket20-7186
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Mohammed Kwaning (United States v. Mohammed Kwaning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mohammed Kwaning, (4th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7186

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MOHAMMED KWANING, a/k/a Kofi,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:14-cr-00600-GLR-2)

Submitted: July 9, 2021 Decided: July 28, 2021

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mohammed Kwaning, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mohammed Kwaning appeals the district court’s order denying his post-judgment

motion for discharge for lack of jurisdiction. Kwaning filed his motion after we affirmed

his conviction and sentence. See United States v. Kwaning, 786 F. App’x 388 (4th Cir.

2019), cert. denied, 140 S. Ct. 1231 (2020). The district court denied the motion for the

reasons stated in the Government’s opposition thereto. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motion and affirm the district

court’s order. See United States v. Kwaning, No. 1:14-cr-00600-GLR-2 (D. Md. July 28,

2020); see also United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 629-31 (2002); Breese v. United

States, 226 U.S. 1, 9-11 (1912). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Breese v. United States
226 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1912)
United States v. Cotton
535 U.S. 625 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Mohammed Kwaning, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mohammed-kwaning-ca4-2021.