United States v. Mohammad-Omar

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 7, 2010·No. 10-6838·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6838

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MOHAMMAD ASHRAY MOHAMMAD-OMAR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cr-00425-CMH-3)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 7, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mohammad Ashray Mohammad-Omar, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Donald Mellin, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mohammad Ashray Mohammad-Omar appeals the district

court’s order denying his request for production of transcripts.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Mohammad-Omar, No. 1:07-cr-00425-CMH-3

(E.D. Va. May 27, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mohammad-Omar, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Mohammad-Omar (United States v. Mohammad-Omar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.