United States v. Moffett

16 C.M.A. 189, 16 USCMA 189, 36 C.M.R. 345, 1966 CMA LEXIS 270, 1966 WL 4476
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedApril 8, 1966
DocketNo. 19,129
StatusPublished

This text of 16 C.M.A. 189 (United States v. Moffett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Moffett, 16 C.M.A. 189, 16 USCMA 189, 36 C.M.R. 345, 1966 CMA LEXIS 270, 1966 WL 4476 (cma 1966).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

FERGUSON, Judge:

This case involves precisely the same issue as United States v Kugima, 16 USCMA 183, 36 CMR 339, this day decided: Whether Colonel Andrew I. Lyman was authorized to act as the Commanding Officer, Third Marine Division, and thus appoint the general court-martial which tried and sentenced the accused. For the reasons set forth in United States v Kugima, supra, we find that he occupied the stated capacity during the period in question.

The decision of the board of review is affirmed.

Chief Judge Quinn and Judge Kil-day concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Kugima
16 C.M.A. 183 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 C.M.A. 189, 16 USCMA 189, 36 C.M.R. 345, 1966 CMA LEXIS 270, 1966 WL 4476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-moffett-cma-1966.