United States v. Mobley

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mobley. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 F. App'x 127
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2002·No. 02-6118·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6118

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ARTHUR T. MOBLEY, a/k/a Terry, a/k/a Go Go Terry,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-51, CA-01-134-AM)

Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002

Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur T. Mobley, Appellant Pro Se. Gerald J. Smagala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Arthur T. Mobley seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Mobley, Nos. CR-96-51; CA-01-134-AM (E.D. Va.

filed July 31, 2001 & entered Aug. 1, 2001; filed Sept. 27, 2001 &

entered Sept. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mobley, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Mobley (United States v. Mobley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related