United States v. Mobley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6118
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ARTHUR T. MOBLEY, a/k/a Terry, a/k/a Go Go Terry,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-51, CA-01-134-AM)
Submitted: April 25, 2002 Decided: May 6, 2002
Before WILLIAMS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur T. Mobley, Appellant Pro Se. Gerald J. Smagala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Arthur T. Mobley seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.
2001), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
United States v. Mobley, Nos. CR-96-51; CA-01-134-AM (E.D. Va.
filed July 31, 2001 & entered Aug. 1, 2001; filed Sept. 27, 2001 &
entered Sept. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Mobley (United States v. Mobley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.