United States v. Mitra, Rajib K.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 13, 2005·No. 04-2328·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED ORDER

Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 13, 2005

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United Plaintiff-Appellee, States District Court for the Western

No. 04-2328 v. District of Wisconsin.

RAJIB K. MITRA, No. 03-CR-153-S Defendant-Appellant. John C. Shabaz, Judge.

Order

After concluding that the district court had correctly calculated the range under the Sentencing Guidelines, this court ordered a limited remand so that the district court could state on the record whether the sentence remains appropriate now that United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), has limited the Guidelines to advisory status. See United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005).

The district judge has replied that he would today impose the same sentence, knowing of the Guidelines' advisory status. The range under the Guidelines is 87 to 108 months, and Mitra's sentence of 96 months is slightly below its mid-point. We do not see any reason why such a sentence would be deemed "unreasonable" in post-Booker practice. The judgment of the district court therefore is affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mitra, Rajib K., (7th Cir. 2005).

United States v. Mitra, Rajib K. (United States v. Mitra, Rajib K.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)