United States v. Mitchell
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT August 20, 2003
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-40005 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee, versus
KENNETH P. MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-95-CR-133-1 --------------------
Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender, appointed to represent Kenneth
P. Mitchell, has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Mitchell has not filed a response to counsel’s motion and brief.
Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Mitchell (United States v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.