United States v. Mitchell
This text of United States v. Mitchell (United States v. Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _____________________
No. 99-40883 Summary Calendar _____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
LACHANDRA LATAAN MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant. _________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (1:98-CR-200-ALL) _________________________________________________________________ March 22, 2000
Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Lachandra Lataan Mitchell appeals her conviction for one count
of possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21
U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).
First, Mitchell contends that the district court erred in
denying her motion to suppress. The officers’ initial stop of
Mitchell was properly based on a violation of Texas law, namely,
her failure to have a properly displayed license plate, and their
subsequent detention of Mitchell was founded upon reasonable
suspicion. See United States v. Prudhome, 13 F.3d 147, 149 (5th
Cir.), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1097 (1994); United States v. Tellez,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 11 F.3d 530, 532 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1060
(1994). Accordingly, the district court did not err in denying the
motion to suppress. See United States v. Inocencio, 40 F.3d 716,
721 (5th Cir. 1994).
Next, Mitchell claims insufficient evidence to support her
conviction. When stopped, Mitchell consented to her vehicle being
searched. Crack and powder cocaine, with an approximate $250,000
street value, was found in the trunk. Her conviction was amply
supported by evidence of her guilty knowledge and intent to
distribute the cocaine. See United States v. Jones, 185 F.3d 459,
464 (5th Cir. 1999).
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mitchell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mitchell-ca5-2000.