United States v. Mitchell
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-31044 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RUDY THOMAS MITCHELL,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CR-10007-ALL - - - - - - - - - - May 15, 1998 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Rudy Thomas Mitchell appeals the sentence he received after
he pleaded guilty to possession of a machine gun. Mitchell has
not shown that the district court mistakenly thought that it
could not downwardly depart or that the court misapplied the
Sentencing Guidelines. Thus, Mitchell’s argument that he was
entitled to a downward departure in his sentence based on
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. - 2 -
economic loss to third parties is not reviewable. See United
States v. DiMarco, 46 F.3d 476, 477-78 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Mitchell (United States v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.