United States v. Mitchell

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mitchell

114 F. App'x 548

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mitchell. Read the opinion of the Court — 70 F. App'x 707 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 12, 2004·No. 04-6895·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. CR-02-25 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2004 & entered May 6, 2004). We deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jamal Mitchell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of real property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Mitchell, No. CR-02-25 (E.D. Va. filed May 5, 2004 & entered May 6, 2004). We deny Mitchell’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Mitchell, 114 F. App'x 548 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

114 F. App'x 548 (United States v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.