United States v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 9, 1997·No. 97-6889·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6889

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WAYNE ERIC MITCHELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CR-94-96, CA-97-156)

Submitted: November 18, 1997 Decided: December 9, 1997

Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne Eric Mitchell, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil- ity and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Mitchell, Nos. CR-94-96; CA-97-156 (M.D.N.C. May 23, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Mitchell, (4th Cir. 1997).

United States v. Mitchell (United States v. Mitchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related