United States v. Mintz

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Mintz

520 F. App'x 225

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 6, 2013·No. No. 12-8003·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Blaine Mintz appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to appoint new counsel and for an extension of time to file a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reduce sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mintz, No. 1:08-cr-00040-MR-l (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Edward Blaine Mintz appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to appoint new counsel and for an extension of time to file a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion to reduce sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Mintz, No. 1:08-cr-00040-MR-l (W.D.N.C. Nov. 7, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mintz, 520 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

520 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Mintz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.