United States v. Minor Moody

32 F. App'x 179
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 4, 2002
Docket01-3478
StatusUnpublished

This text of 32 F. App'x 179 (United States v. Minor Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Minor Moody, 32 F. App'x 179 (8th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Minor Moody appeals from the district court’s 1 commitment order following proceedings under 18 U.S.C. § 4246. Having carefully reviewed the record, and having considered the unanimous expert opinion, we reject Moody’s contention that the district court clearly erred in finding he suffered from a mental disease or defect such that his unconditional release would create a substantial risk of danger. See United States v. S.A., 129 F.3d 995, 1000 (8th Cir.1997) (standard of review), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1011, 118 S.Ct. 1200, 140 L.Ed.2d 329 (1998). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court committing Moody to the custody of the Attorney General pending the location of a suitable facility to oversee his conditional release. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, over Moody’s resistance.

A true copy.

1

. The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the HONORABLE JAMES C. ENGLAND, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. S.A.
129 F.3d 995 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
Alphonse v. United States
523 U.S. 1011 (Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 F. App'x 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-minor-moody-ca8-2002.