United States v. Minor
This text of United States v. Minor (United States v. Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-30392 Document: 00515823652 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/15/2021
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 20-30392 FILED April 15, 2021 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Fletcher Terrell Minor,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 3:19-CR-202-1
Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Fletcher Terrel Minor pleaded guilty to one count of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of § 922(g)(1) and was sentenced to 120 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, Minor argues that the district court erred in enhancing his
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-30392 Document: 00515823652 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/15/2021
No. 20-30392
base offense level, inter alia, due to his prior conviction for Louisiana possession with intent to distribute cocaine, in violation of Louisiana Revised Statutes § 40:967(A). In United States v. Frierson, 981 F.3d 314 (5th Cir. 2020), this court determined that § 40:967 is “divisible and, under the modified categorical approach, sufficiently narrow to serve as a predicate for sentence enhancement under § 4B1.1(a).” In so holding, this court also rejected the defendant’s argument—identical to the claim raised by Minor—that § 40:967(A) is “facially broader than its federal counterpart because Carisoprodol is regulated by the State but not federally controlled.” Frierson, 981 F.3d at 316 n.1. In light of Frierson, the district court did not err, plainly or otherwise, in imposing an enhanced base offense level due to Minor’s prior conviction for Louisiana possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Minor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-minor-ca5-2021.