United States v. Minor

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Minor

25 F. App'x 208

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 28, 2002·No. 01-7557·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Bernard Minor appeals from the district court’s order finding his motion for return of property barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Minor, Nos. CR-91-201; CA-96-394-6 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Curtis Bernard Minor appeals from the district court’s order finding his motion for return of property barred by the statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Minor, Nos. CR-91-201; CA-96-394-6 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Minor, 25 F. App'x 208 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

25 F. App'x 208 (United States v. Minor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.