United States v. Milton Holloway

Second Circuit

United States v. Milton Holloway

311 F.2d 795

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 23, 1963·No. 27822·Published

Opinion

311 F.2d 795

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Milton HOLLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 220, Docket 27822.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 23, 1963.
Decided Jan. 23, 1963.

Milton Holloway, pro se, submitted.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., S.D. New York, William J. Quinlan, Andrew T. McEvoy, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., submitted brief for appellee.

Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court Judge Dimock's denial of the petitioner's motion without hearing. The files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

311 F.2d 795

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Milton HOLLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 220, Docket 27822.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Jan. 23, 1963.
Decided Jan. 23, 1963.

Milton Holloway, pro se, submitted.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., S.D. New York, William J. Quinlan, Andrew T. McEvoy, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., submitted brief for appellee.

Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in open court Judge Dimock's denial of the petitioner's motion without hearing. The files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.

United States v. Milton Holloway, 311 F.2d 795 (2d Cir. 1963).

Pincite

311 F.2d 795 (United States v. Milton Holloway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.