United States v. Milton Holloway
This text of 311 F.2d 795 (United States v. Milton Holloway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
311 F.2d 795
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Milton HOLLOWAY, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 220, Docket 27822.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Jan. 23, 1963.
Decided Jan. 23, 1963.
Milton Holloway, pro se, submitted.
Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., S.D. New York, William J. Quinlan, Andrew T. McEvoy, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., submitted brief for appellee.
Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in open court Judge Dimock's denial of the petitioner's motion without hearing. The files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
311 F.2d 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-milton-holloway-ca2-1963.