United States v. Milton George Bigalk

163 F. App'x 447
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 2006
Docket05-1003
StatusUnpublished

This text of 163 F. App'x 447 (United States v. Milton George Bigalk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Milton George Bigalk, 163 F. App'x 447 (8th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury found Milton George Bigalk guilty of failing to surrender as ordered to serve a previously imposed federal sentence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3146(a)(2). The district court 1 sen *448 tenced him to 21 months in prison and 3 years of supervised release, and he appeals.

Mr. Bigalk challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, we conclude that it is sufficient. See United States v. Marion, 977 F.2d 1284, 1287 (8th Cir.1992) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny Mr. Bigalk’s pro se “affidavit and demand for charging affidavits.”

1

. The Honorable Donald D. Alsop, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 F. App'x 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-milton-george-bigalk-ca8-2006.