United States v. Milton

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Milton

624 F. App'x 719

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 2, 2015·No. No. 15-11468·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Midgett, appointed counsel for Lawrence Corey Milton, has filed a motion to withdraw on.appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Milton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Midgett, appointed counsel for Lawrence Corey Milton, has filed a motion to withdraw on.appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Milton’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Milton, 624 F. App'x 719 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

624 F. App'x 719 (United States v. Milton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related