United States v. Milton Alphonso Spencer

523 F. App'x 652
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJuly 16, 2013
Docket13-10077
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 523 F. App'x 652 (United States v. Milton Alphonso Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Milton Alphonso Spencer, 523 F. App'x 652 (11th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Susan Good Yagzi, appointed counsel for Milton Alphonso Spencer in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the revocation of Spencer’s supervised release and his sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
523 F. App'x 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-milton-alphonso-spencer-ca11-2013.