United States v. Millo

392 F.2d 591
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 25, 1968·No. No. 513, Docket 29743·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After we affirmed the conviction of Millo, 354 F.2d 224 (2 Cir. 1965), appellant petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for the issuance of a writ of certiorari to review that affirmance. The writ having been granted, the judgment of conviction in the district court and the judgment of this court affirming the conviction were vacated and the action was remanded to us, sub nom Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202, 88 S.Ct. 899, 19 L.Ed.2d 1034 (1968), for further consideration in the light of Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39, 88 S.Ct. 697, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968).

After taking further consideration we now on the authority of Marchetti remand the case to the district court and direct that the indictment be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Millo, 392 F.2d 591 (2d Cir. 1968).

392 F.2d 591 (United States v. Millo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. $3,296.00 in Currency
286 F. Supp. 543 (N.D. New York, 1968)