United States v. Miller

26 F. Cas. 1254, 2 D.C. 247, 2 Cranch 247

This text of 26 F. Cas. 1254 (United States v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Miller, 26 F. Cas. 1254, 2 D.C. 247, 2 Cranch 247 (circtddc 1821).

Opinion

The Court

however,

(Cranch, C. J., contra,)

was of opinion that no direct answer to the question could furnish evidence against the witness, and that he was bound to answer it. This the witness still refused to do ; and the Court committed him for the contempt. He petitioned the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of habeas corpus, at February term, 1822, but it was refused upon the ground that that Court had no appellate jurisdiction in criminal causes. 7 Wheat. 38.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Kearney
20 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 1822)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Cas. 1254, 2 D.C. 247, 2 Cranch 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-miller-circtddc-1821.