United States v. Miller

312 F. App'x 644
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 607 F.3d 144
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2009·No. 07-40880·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Melvin Miller has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). That brief, inter alia: addresses the two issues identified in our court’s prior order; and alleges no prejudice. See United States v. Miller, No. 07-40880 (5th Cir.19 Aug.2008) (denying counsel’s previous motion to withdraw and directing counsel to file a brief addressing concerns related to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(2) and 11(b)(1)(E)). Miller has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief disclose no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5tu Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Miller, 312 F. App'x 644 (5th Cir. 2009).

312 F. App'x 644 (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)