United States v. Miller
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10731 (Summary Calendar) __________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VERNON ANTHONY MILLER,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (USDC No. 3:94-CR-343-G) - - - - - - - - - - May 17, 1996
Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Vernon Anthony Miller challenges the district court's finding
that he was competent to stand trial for conspiracy to commit bank
robbery, bank robbery and aiding and abetting, using and carrying
a firearm during a crime of violence and aiding and abetting, and
interstate transport of a stolen vehicle and aiding and abetting.
We have thoroughly reviewed the briefs and the record and find
no error in the district court's finding. We affirm essentially
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. for the reasons explained by the district court in its ruling given
at the conclusion of the hearing held on April 5, 1996.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Miller (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.