United States v. Miller

131 F. App'x 393
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 248 F. App'x 426
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided May 16, 2005·No. 02-4304·Unpublished

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

SMITH, Circuit Judge.

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) After Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

In an opinion filed on April 15, 2004, we agreed with the United States, the appellant in this criminal appeal, and concluded *394 that there were “no facts in this record to support the District Court’s downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.3 or' U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0.” Consistent with that determination, we vacated the judgment of the District Court sentencing Earnest Miller to 41 months imprisonment.

Miller filed a timely petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court. After issuing its decision in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), the Supreme Court granted Miller’s petition for writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and remanded for further proceedings in light of Booker.

Thereafter, the Clerk of this Court directed the parties in a notice dated March 3, 2005, to comment on the applicability of Booker. Neither party responded. Thus, it appears that neither party seeks resentencing in accordance with Booker. For that reason, we will affirm the judgment of sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Miller, 131 F. App'x 393 (3d Cir. 2005).

131 F. App'x 393 (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)