United States v. Miller

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Miller

923 F.2d 158, 1991 WL 3017

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 15, 1991·No. No. 88-8714·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument during the week of June 10, 1991. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc without oral argument during the week of June 10, 1991. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

United States v. Miller, 923 F.2d 158, 1991 WL 3017 (11th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

923 F.2d 158 (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related