United States v. Miller

Tenth Circuit

United States v. Miller

21 F.3d 1025, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7226, 1994 WL 123669

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided April 13, 1994·No. No. 93-2059·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

We have concluded this appeal is governed by United States v. Little, 18 F.3d 1499, 1504-05 (10th Cir.1994) (en banc). The judgment of the district court¹ is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

We have concluded this appeal is governed by United States v. Little, 18 F.3d 1499, 1504-05 (10th Cir.1994) (en banc). The judgment of the district court¹ is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings.

United States v. Miller, 21 F.3d 1025, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 7226, 1994 WL 123669 (10th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

21 F.3d 1025 (United States v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related