United States v. Miller

26 F. Supp. 1002, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 821, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3075
CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 3, 1939
Docket3926
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 26 F. Supp. 1002 (United States v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Miller, 26 F. Supp. 1002, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 821, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3075 (W.D. Ark. 1939).

Opinion

HEARTSILL RAGON, District Judge.

The defendants in this case are charged with unlawfully and feloniously transporting in interstate commerce from the town of • Claremore, Oklahoma, to the town of Siloam Springs in the State of Arkansas, a double barrel twelve gauge shot gun having a barrel less than eighteen inches in length, and at the time of so transporting said fire arm in interstate commerce they *1003 did not have in their possession a stamp-affixed written order for said fire arm as required by Section 1132c, Title 26 U.S. C.A., and the regulations issued under the authority of said Act of Congress known as the National Firearms Act, 26 U.S. C.A. § 1132 et seq.

The defendants in due time filed a demurrer challenging the sufficiency of the facts stated in the indictment to constitute a crime and further challenging the sections under which said indictment was returned as being in contravention of the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, U.S.C.A.

The indictment is based upon the Act of June 26, 1934, C. 757, Section 11, 48 Stat. 1239, 26 U.S.C.A. § 1132j. The court is of the opinion that this section is invalid in that it violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, U.S.C.A., providing, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

The demurrer is accordingly sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. District of Columbia
311 F. Supp. 2d 103 (District of Columbia, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 F. Supp. 1002, 22 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 821, 1939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-miller-arwd-1939.