United States v. Mikhail
This text of United States v. Mikhail (United States v. Mikhail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-4157
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
AMEER G. MIKHAIL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR- 03-407)
Submitted: April 28, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ameer G. Mikhail, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Ameer G. Mikhail appeals the district court’s order
affirming the magistrate judge’s finding of guilt for a traffic
violation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Mikhail, No. CR-03-407 (D.
Md. Feb. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Mikhail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mikhail-ca4-2004.