United States v. Mikhail

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 29, 2004
Docket04-4157
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Mikhail (United States v. Mikhail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mikhail, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AMEER G. MIKHAIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR- 03-407)

Submitted: April 28, 2004 Decided: June 29, 2004

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ameer G. Mikhail, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Clayton Hanlon, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Ameer G. Mikhail appeals the district court’s order

affirming the magistrate judge’s finding of guilt for a traffic

violation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. Mikhail, No. CR-03-407 (D.

Md. Feb. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Mikhail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mikhail-ca4-2004.