United States v. Mike Adams

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Mike Adams

380 F. App'x 950

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Mike Adams. Read the opinion of the Court — 503 F. App'x 778 →

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 2, 2010·No. 09-15854·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

O. Hale Almand, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Tyrone Adams, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

O. Hale Almand, Jr., appointed counsel for Michael Tyrone Adams, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant, because, in his opinion, the appeal is without merit. Counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Adams’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Mike Adams, 380 F. App'x 950 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

380 F. App'x 950 (United States v. Mike Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related