United States v. Mikaelian
180 F.3d 1091, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6509, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5001, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13867
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 24, 1999
DocketNos. 97-50174, 97-50184, 97-50260 and 97-50295
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 180 F.3d 1091 (United States v. Mikaelian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Mikaelian, 180 F.3d 1091, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6509, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5001, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13867 (9th Cir. 1999).
Opinion
ORDER
The slip opinion filed February 17, 1999 is amended as follows:
(1) At slip opinion page 1358, line 14, insert “after sentencing” after “cooperate.”
(2) At slip opinion page 1359, line 9, delete “it claims.”
With the foregoing changes to the opinion, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Facundo Acosta-Chavez
727 F.3d 903 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Mikaelian
30 F. App'x 692 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
180 F.3d 1091, 99 Daily Journal DAR 6509, 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5001, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 13867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mikaelian-ca9-1999.