United States v. Miguel Rivas-Estrada

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 12, 2018·No. 17-40124·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-40124 Document: 00514552135 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/12/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED

No. 17-40124 July 12, 2018 Conference Calendar

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MIGUEL ANGEL RIVAS-ESTRADA; JUSTA CENTENO-HERRERA; JOSE ANGEL OLVERA; FELIPA TORRES-LOPEZ,

Defendants-Appellants

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15-CR-1-26

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent one of the appellants in this case, Jose Angel Olvera, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Olvera has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40124 Document: 00514552135 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/12/2018

No. 17-40124

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and Olvera’s appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Miguel Rivas-Estrada, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Miguel Rivas-Estrada (United States v. Miguel Rivas-Estrada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)