United States v. Mignogna

53 F. Supp. 738, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2668
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedJanuary 26, 1944
DocketNo. 39063
StatusPublished

This text of 53 F. Supp. 738 (United States v. Mignogna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Mignogna, 53 F. Supp. 738, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2668 (E.D.N.Y. 1944).

Opinion

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

The defendant was indicted for unlawfully, wilfully, knowingly and feloniously taking a large number of gasoline ration books and coupons, property of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 99.

Arraigned on March 22, 1943, the defendant pleaded not guilty. On April 2, 1943, being represented by counsel and warned by the court of the punishment which might follow his doing so, the defendant in open court withdrew his plea of not guilty and pleaded guilty as charged. On April 22, 1943, defendant was sentenced to imprisonment. In November, 1943, defendant moved for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty, to have the sentence vacated and the cause restored to the trial calendar on the alleged ground that he was denied the opportunity to adequately prepare for trial. After three days’ hearings on that application, the court rendered its decision denying the motion.

- A motion is now made for an order, purportedly pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 832,1 directing the United States and the Attorney General to pay the cost of the stenographic copy of the testimony taken at those hearings.

The statute under which application is made does not authorize the relief sought. It applies only to court costs and provides in some cases for the printing of the record in the appellate court at Government expense. It does not authorize the procurement of a transcript of the testimony nor the payment for services m reporting evidence taken at the trial nor for the obtaining of it by the Government in behalf of an indigent defendant. Miller v. United States, 317 U.S. 192, 197, 63 S.Ct. 187.

The motion is therefore denied.

Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. United States
317 U.S. 192 (Supreme Court, 1942)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 F. Supp. 738, 1944 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mignogna-nyed-1944.