United States v. Middlebrooks

388 F. App'x 949
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 26, 2010·No. No. 09-14374·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

John R. Francisco, appointed counsel for Tavares Middlebrooks, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Middlebrooks’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Middlebrooks, 388 F. App'x 949 (11th Cir. 2010).

388 F. App'x 949 (United States v. Middlebrooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)