United States v. Mickle
This text of 26 F. Cas. 1242 (United States v. Mickle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
said they had decided, in Ismenard’s Case [Case No. 15,450], on the same indictment, that the distribution of spirituous liquors at the gaming-table, without receiving payment specifically therefor, was not a retailing of spirituous liquors within the meaning of the act.
Mr. Jones, for United States, gave up the 2d count.
Verdict, “Guilty on the 1st count”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 F. Cas. 1242, 1 Cranch 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-mickle-circtddc-1805.