United States v. Mickle
26 F. Cas. 1242, 1 Cranch 268
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1805·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
said they had decided, in Ismenard’s Case [Case No. 15,450], on the same indictment, that the distribution of spirituous liquors at the gaming-table, without receiving payment specifically therefor, was not a retailing of spirituous liquors within the meaning of the act.
Mr. Jones, for United States, gave up the 2d count.
Verdict, “Guilty on the 1st count”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Mickle, 26 F. Cas. 1242, 1 Cranch 268 (circtddc 1805).
26 F. Cas. 1242 (United States v. Mickle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City of Springfield v. Ford
40 Mo. App. 586 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1890)