United States v. Michael Wright

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Michael Wright. Read the opinion of the Court — 777 F.3d 635
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 11, 2012·No. 10-3552·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 10-3552 _____________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant

v.

MICHAEL WRIGHT and RANDALL WRIGHT __________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Nos. 5:09-cr-00270-001 & 5:09-cr-00270-002) District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel

Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO, FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges

ORDER

Upon further consideration, this Court concludes that rehearing en banc is not necessary in the above-captioned case. Accordingly, the order of this Court, dated July 6, 2012, ordering rehearing en banc is hereby vacated.

By the Court,

/s/ Theodore A. McKee Chief Circuit Judge Dated: July 11, 2012

Smw/cc: Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq. Mark S. Greenberg, Esq. Michael N. Huff, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael Wright, (3d Cir. 2012).

United States v. Michael Wright (United States v. Michael Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.