United States v. Michael Stephens

695 F. App'x 944
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedAugust 22, 2017
Docket15-5553
StatusUnpublished

This text of 695 F. App'x 944 (United States v. Michael Stephens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Stephens, 695 F. App'x 944 (6th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Stephens received a career-offender guidelines enhancement in connection with his sentence for conspiracy to possess and distribute cocaine. On appeal, we upheld the enhancement on the basis of Stephens’ prior convictions for aggravated burglary, Tenn. Code § 39-14-403, attempted aggravated burglary, id., and felony drug possession. United States v. Stephens, 651 Fed.Appx. 445 (6th Cir. 2016). Applying United States v. Ozier, 796 F.3d 597, 600-03 (6th Cir. 2015), we found Tennessee’s aggravated burglary statute divisible. As a result, we looked to the facts of Stephens’ prior conviction for attempted aggravated burglary to determine whether he had committed a generic form of the offense of “burglary of a dwelling.” We found that he had. Stephens, 651 Fed.Appx. at 448. Following Mathis v. United States, — U.S. -, 136. S.Ct. 2243, 195 L.Ed.2d 604 (2016), the Supreme Court vacated this judgment and remanded for further consideration. In light of Mathis and our recent decision in United States v. Stitt, 860 F.3d 854, 857-59 (6th Cir. 2017) (en banc), we reverse our prior determination and remand for resentencing, as both the government and Stephens agree is appropriate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Nathaniel Ozier
796 F.3d 597 (Sixth Circuit, 2015)
Mathis v. United States
579 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 2016)
United States v. Victor Stitt
860 F.3d 854 (Sixth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Stephens
651 F. App'x 445 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 F. App'x 944, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-stephens-ca6-2017.