United States v. Michael Roman Black

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 2026
Docket25-11611
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Michael Roman Black (United States v. Michael Roman Black) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Roman Black, (11th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 25-11611 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 02/13/2026 Page: 1 of 3

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 25-11609 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

MICHAEL ROMAN BLACK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00300-RDP-GMB-4 ____________________ ____________________ No. 25-11610 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, USCA11 Case: 25-11611 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 02/13/2026 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11609

versus

MICHAEL ROMAN BLACK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00318-RDP-GMB-1 ____________________ ____________________ No. 25-11611 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

MICHAEL ROMAN BLACK, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:23-cr-00148-RDP-GMB-1 ____________________

Before BRASHER, ABUDU, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: USCA11 Case: 25-11611 Document: 20-1 Date Filed: 02/13/2026 Page: 3 of 3

25-11609 Opinion of the Court 3

Thomas M. Goggans, appointed counsel for Michael Roman Black in these appeals, has moved to withdraw from further repre- sentation of the appellant and filed briefs pursuant to Anders v. Cal- ifornia, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire records reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the en- tire records reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Black’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Michael Roman Black, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-roman-black-ca11-2026.