United States v. Michael Roman Black

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided February 13, 2026·No. 25-11611·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

No. 25-11609

Non-Argument Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ROMAN BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00300-RDP-GMB-4

No. 25-11610

Non-Argument Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

2 Opinion of the Court 25-11609

versus

MICHAEL ROMAN BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:22-cr-00318-RDP-GMB-1

No. 25-11611

Non-Argument Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ROMAN BLACK, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 2:23-cr-00148-RDP-GMB-1

Before BRASHER, ABUDU, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

25-11609 Opinion of the Court 3

Thomas M. Goggans, appointed counsel for Michael Roman Black in these appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed briefs pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire records reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire records reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motions to withdraw are GRANTED, and Black’s convictions and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Michael Roman Black, (11th Cir. 2026).

United States v. Michael Roman Black (United States v. Michael Roman Black) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)