United States v. Michael Pena

557 F. App'x 348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 27, 2014
Docket13-40531
StatusUnpublished

This text of 557 F. App'x 348 (United States v. Michael Pena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Pena, 557 F. App'x 348 (5th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Michael Pena appeals his 97-month sentence imposed following a jury trial conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. Pena argues that the district court prevented him from arguing that he was entitled to a safety-valve adjustment and a minor-role adjustment. This argument is factually incorrect because the district court allowed him to make these arguments at the sentencing hearing. In any event, Pena has not shown that, given his admitted lies in court, the denials of the safety-valve adjustment and minor-role adjustment were clearly erroneous. See United States v. Davis, 76 F.3d 82, 84 (5th Cir.1996). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Davis
76 F.3d 82 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 F. App'x 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-pena-ca5-2014.