United States v. Michael Negele

222 F.3d 443, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20923, 2000 WL 1159487
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 17, 2000
Docket99-3522
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 222 F.3d 443 (United States v. Michael Negele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Negele, 222 F.3d 443, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20923, 2000 WL 1159487 (8th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

BYE, Circuit Judge.

In one of the most deplorable and grotesque chapters in human history, the Third Reich exterminated vast populations based upon their racial, ethnic, and religious characteristics. As this appeal demonstrates, that genocide continues to affect lives even today. The district court 1 revoked Michael Negele’s United States citizenship, finding that Negele misrepresen *445 ted his war record as a Nazi concentration camp guard in order to obtain citizenship in this country. Negele challenges the adverse judgment on both jurisdictional and substantive grounds. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Negele, ethnically German, was born in Romania in 1920. In 1942, the Romanian Army drafted Negele into service. In 1943, he moved from the Romanian Army to the German Schutzstaffel, ubiquitously shortened to SS. 2 The SS, an organ of the Nazi party, acted as the federal police force in Germany. One part of the SS was called the Waffen SS; in German, ivaffen means “armed.” The Waffen SS was further subdivided into two wings. One wing trained as a military formation, somewhat akin to the standing German army. The other wing, the Death’s Head unit, operated and guarded the concentration camps. Negele joined the Waffen SS as a Death’s Head guard. From 1943 to 1944, he guarded civilian prisoners at the Sachsen-hausen concentration camp near Berlin.

The Sachsenhausen camp obtained the labor of prisoners before they died. The camp essentially worked prisoners to death. Death’s Head guards at Sachsen-hausen kept track of prisoners, guarded the slave-labor detail outside the camp, and brought the prisoners back to the camp at night. Guards were trained to perform various duties. They received weapons instruction in rifles and pistols, drill instruction, ideological indoctrination, instruction in identifying and guarding prisoners and loading and unloading prisoners from trains. The guards at Sa-chsenhausen were instructed to shoot prisoners who attempted to escape the camp.

Negele received special training with guard dogs beginning at Sachsenhausen. Death’s Head guard dogs were used frequently around the prisoner work details. The Waffen SS trained dogs to attack prisoners when they attempted to escape.

In 1944, Negele was transferred (along with his guard dog) to Theresienstadt, a Jewish ghetto located in the former Czechoslovakia. Theresienstadt operated as an internment camp that held Jews and other prisoners awaiting transport to the death camps. Starvation and disease killed thousands of prisoners in Theresienstadt. Ne-gele policed the exterior of the ghetto, attempting to prevent prisoner escapes. Guards at Theresienstadt also ensured the transport of prisoners to the trains destined for Auschwitz and other death camps.

In May 1945, as the Russian army advanced on Theresienstadt from the east, Negele and other guards rid their SS uniforms of all markings that linked them to the Death’s Head unit. Negele discarded his SS identification card and uniform badge. As a result, the Russians never discovered Negele’s participation in the Waffen SS. Negele was held as a prisoner of war until August 1945. He then lived in various towns in Germany until 1948. Ne-gele ultimately traveled to Stuttgart, where he applied for an immigration visa to the United States.

In Stuttgart, Negele completed the application for an immigration visa with the aid of a clerk. The clerk asked Negele questions in German, then typed his responses onto the application form in English. When the clerk asked Negele about his wartime residences, Negele told the clerk he served in the “Romanian Army” and the “German Army.” Negele did not disclose his service in the Waffen SS. 3 The application process required an applicant to sign the application after an interview with the vice consul, and swear to the truthfulness of the application information. Negele never changed his answers about *446 his war record, and he ultimately signed the application.

On February 23, 1950, the government granted Negele an immigrant visa. Less than one month later, on March 22, 1950, Negele arrived in New York. On September 9, 1955, the Eastern District of Missouri granted Negele’s petition for naturalization. Negele worked in the aircraft industry until his retirement in 1986. Ne-gele now resides in St. Peters, Missouri.

The government filed a three-count complaint seeking to revoke Negele’s citizenship in September 1997. Any one of the counts, if proven, entitled the government to denaturalize Negele. The district court held a bench trial in mid-April 1999. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law credited the testimony of an expert witness 4 who opined that Waffen SS Death’s Head guards were automatically rejected for immigration, whether they served voluntarily or not. 5 The court also relied upon the government’s documentary evidence showing that the United States categorically rejected individuals because of their service in the Waffen SS Death’s Head guard battalion at Sachsenhausen. Consequently, the court determined that Negele was ineligible for an immigration visa, and therefore ineligible for citizenship. On July 20, 1999, the court issued a comprehensive ninety-page memorandum opinion, entered judgment against Negele, and revoked his citizenship. Negele now appeals.

DISCUSSION

A. Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Negele challenges our exercise of jurisdiction. We must resolve jurisdictional questions first. See Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83, 95, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998). Most of Negele’s jurisdictional arguments lack merit. We therefore limit our discussion to two points that deserve consideration.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 provides, inter alia, that the government shall

institute proceedings in any district court ... for the purpose of revoking and setting aside the order admitting [a] person to citizenship and canceling the certificate of naturalization on the ground that such order and certificate of naturalization were illegally procured or were procured by concealment of a material fact or by willful misrepresentation. ...

8 U.S.C. § 1451(a).

Section 1451(a) confers authority on the federal courts to hear revocation of citizenship actions brought by the government. Negele objects, apparently on the ground that he did not illegally procure the naturalization order. Insofar as Negele’s objection is jurisdictional in character, the objection is unfounded. The government bears the burden of proving at trial that Negele illegally procured his citizenship. That is an “element of the offense,” so to speak. If the government failed to prove illegal procurement, the district court would not be divested of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sardakowski v. State of Texas
D. South Dakota, 2024
United States v. Rubalcava Gonzales
179 F. Supp. 3d 917 (E.D. Missouri, 2016)
Doe v. Nestle, S.A.
748 F. Supp. 2d 1057 (C.D. California, 2010)
United States v. Joseph Wittje
422 F.3d 479 (Seventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Firishchak
426 F. Supp. 2d 780 (N.D. Illinois, 2005)
United States v. Hansl
364 F. Supp. 2d 966 (S.D. Iowa, 2005)
United States v. Mandycz
359 F. Supp. 2d 601 (E.D. Michigan, 2005)
United States v. Wittje
333 F. Supp. 2d 737 (N.D. Illinois, 2004)
United States v. Friedrich
305 F. Supp. 2d 1101 (E.D. Missouri, 2004)
United States v. Algimantas M. Dailide
316 F.3d 611 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Newell v. Rolling Hills Apartments
134 F. Supp. 2d 1026 (N.D. Iowa, 2001)
Branstad v. Glickman
118 F. Supp. 2d 925 (N.D. Iowa, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
222 F.3d 443, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 20923, 2000 WL 1159487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-negele-ca8-2000.