United States v. Michael Lewis

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 7, 2021
Docket21-1700
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Michael Lewis (United States v. Michael Lewis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Michael Lewis, (8th Cir. 2021).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 21-1700 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Michael Christopher Lewis

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern ____________

Submitted: September 1, 2021 Filed: September 7, 2021 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Michael Lewis appeals the sentence the district court1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to drug and firearm offenses. His counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed

1 The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

After careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose an unreasonable sentence, as there was no indication that it overlooked a relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. Salazar-Aleman, 741 F.3d 878, 881 (8th Cir. 2013) (standard of review); and the sentence was below the Guidelines range, see United States v. Moore, 581 F.3d 681, 684 (8th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). Having independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion and affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Moore
581 F.3d 681 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Ramiro Salazar-Aleman
741 F.3d 878 (Eighth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Michael Lewis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-lewis-ca8-2021.