United States v. Michael Lee Akins

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Michael Lee Akins

420 F.2d 960

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 23, 1969

Docket23504_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 420 F.2d 960 (United States v. Michael Lee Akins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Michael Lee Akins, 420 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that the trial court complied with the requirement of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 that “the court shall not enter a judgment upon a plea of guilty unless it is satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea,” and that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea since it appeared from the record that the sole ground offered in support of the motion was factually untrue.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that the trial court complied with the requirement of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 that “the court shall not enter a judgment upon a plea of guilty unless it is satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea,” and that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea since it appeared from the record that the sole ground offered in support of the motion was factually untrue.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

420 F.2d 960, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-michael-lee-akins-ca9-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack