United States v. Michael Lee Akins

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Michael Lee Akins

420 F.2d 960

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 23, 1969·No. 23504_1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that the trial court complied with the requirement of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 that “the court shall not enter a judgment upon a plea of guilty unless it is satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea,” and that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea since it appeared from the record that the sole ground offered in support of the motion was factually untrue.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are satisfied from an examination of the record that the trial court complied with the requirement of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 that “the court shall not enter a judgment upon a plea of guilty unless it is satisfied that there is a factual basis for the plea,” and that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea since it appeared from the record that the sole ground offered in support of the motion was factually untrue.

Affirmed.

United States v. Michael Lee Akins, 420 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

420 F.2d 960 (United States v. Michael Lee Akins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related